| |
Is
IMS (IP Multimedia Subsystem) a Revolutionary Architecture?
The
last decade has been under the siege of a dual revolution
: the mobile telephony revolution which knocked down
the barriers of user localization, and the Internet revolution whose model liberated us from the constraints
of distance and connection time. A new revolution, just
as spectacular, is now in the works: the convergence
of the Internet and mobile telephony , and the convergence
of these two worlds with that of fixed telephony. In
this emerging and ubiquitous global environment, people
will be communicating with each other in a fluid and
transparent way, mixing voice and data, no matter what
type of terminal they use: smartphone, PC, fixed videophones.
They’ll communicate on the move, and with a combination
of devices.
Today’s operators view IMS
(IP Multimedia Subsystem ) as the foundation in building
networks to accommodate this third convergence revolution.
What is this new architecture all about? What exactly
does it allow you do? How will it be implemented? According
to what timetable? Why is it so critical to operators’
development? What impact will it have on their business
model, and on services rating and billing? Three specialists,
Frédéric Fleurat, Technical Director,
Lucent Technologies France, Isabelle Roussin, VP Marketing
and Solutions, Highdeal, and David McNierney, Strategic
Marketing Director at Highdeal, share their views with
us, views that frequently converge…
TR:
What exactly is IMS ?
Isabelle
Roussin: It’s
an IP based architecture designed by the 3GPP consortium
(Third Generation Partnership Project) , which teams
up operators and solution providers. IMS is based on
the idea that communication networks will gradually
become “all-IP.” The new infrastructure
allows you to benefit from increased bandwidth speed
(from 9.6 Mb per second in 2G, to 384 Mb with the advent
of 3G, and up to 4 Gb a second in 3G+ for video services
transport) by deploying multimedia services such as
: real-time video, multimedia gaming and other applications.
David
McNierney: Before IMS, operators were obliged
to redesign all the components of a solution when a
new service, MMS for example, was introduced: this meant
a complete overhaul of network interfaces, applications,
session management to incorporate new elements such
as heavy data storage, GPRS connections, MMS email addresses,
the different pre-paid and post-paid rating system interfaces,
etc. The task implied a huge investment, with an indeterminate
ROI that depended on the success of the service tested.
It was vital to develop a standard back-office platform,
a common generic trunk that would enable operators to
integrate new applications without having to rebuild
their entire systems from scratch. The point was to
just be able to develop the application itself. IMS
is a standardized technology that enables you to rationalize
the development process.

TR:
What does IMS offer operators in practical terms?
David
McNierney: The financial gain is tremendous if
you consider that the development of a new infrastructure
represents about 60% of the total cost for each new
application launched. With IMS, you make a one-time
investment and recuperate it on all the applications
developed.
Frédéric
Fleurat: Operators can now choose between vertical
applications developed in proprietary systems that cost
less per unit in the short term, but whose interoperability
is limited, and applications developed in open systems
. The latter require a more substantial initial investment
but can stimulate and accelerate the number of applications
launched, and at a far lower cost.
Isabelle
Roussin: For operators, IMS is a key factor for
success. Faced with colossal UMTS licence acquisition
costs, they are being forced to find ways to massively
increase their ARPU (Average Revenue Per User). This
means developing numerous new services under the best
possible conditions and intensifying their usage. IMS
is an ideal solution to the challenge: it gives operators
a greater leeway in testing new applications, the opportunity
to develop more of them, and to launch them more rapidly.
Frédéric
Fleurat: In addition,
applications developed in open systems will enable operators
to better serve their customers. Customers will no longer
be segmented by telephone numbers, but will be regrouped
and integrated in an “Active Phone Book”
(a dynamic directory) containing enriched user profiles.
By adding new elements such as presence, for instance,
it will be feasible to direct their calls and sessions
more effectively. An example: if you want to contact
me after 6 pm, you will be able to do so by whatever
channel I opt for: by MMS on my cell phone, instant
messaging on my PC, the voicebox or email on my smartphone,
on my fixed personal line, or on the other line reserved
for professional calls…
TR:
Does IMS only concern mobile operators?
David
McNierney: No, all the traditional operators
such as France Telecom, British Telecom and Telecom
Italia are now positioning themselves as integrated
operators: voice, mobile, Internet, and embracing IMS
in order to migrate from a voice-based to a session-based
model.

TR:
Could you explain what a session is ?
Frédéric
Fleurat: A simple call has a beginning and an
end, while a session implies a communication continuum
during which all sorts of events can take place, and
be linked or combined. This includes messages: voice,
images, video, texts…as well as to the (number
of) correspondents, both ingoing and outgoing, during
the course of the session. All this is independent from
the access mode: integrated operators have to operate
not only on the level of network convergence, but also
on usage on all types of terminals, whether it’s
a PC, a mobile or a fixed device.
TR:
What types of specific usages do you have in mind?
David
McNierney: There are many of them, from unified
mail messaging to VoIP, without forgetting push-to-talk
which, by the way, is one of the first (ou, leading)
IMS applications.
TR:
Isn’t usage convergence going to require a lot
of new end-user equipment?
Frédéric
Fleurat: On the contrary, the real challenge
for operators will be to maintain their customers’
loyalty on the basis of the equipment they already have,
without making it more complex. All the intelligence
should be in the network and not in an over-sophisticated
terminal that customers can’t afford to buy or
don’t know how to use. Simplicity is the keyword
for getting these new applications to market and getting
them accepted. Obviously, equipment manufacturers may
have a different point of view.
TR:
When do you expect the migration to IMS to take effect
?
Frédéric
Fleurat: The main US operators predict a gradual
conversion to IMS that probably will be completed by
2008. They’ve already launched pilots. Europe
is also on the roadmap. Asia is forging ahead even faster,
as operators in that area of the world don’t have
to contend with traditional systems.
TR:
What role will Highdeal play in the IMS revolution?
David
McNierney: As we’ve seen, IMS is going
to stimulate and accelerate the growth of new applications.
There will be more services available and more combinations
between the various fixed, mobile, and Internet platforms.
There will also be a more diversified content mixing
voice, images, video, as well as more players in the
value chain. All this will require a simulation, pricing
and billing system capable of integrating numerous rating
criteria, a system that’s flexible, interoperable
and, obviously, compatible with IMS architecture. Our
software package meets all these requirements and is
the only one (on the market today) capable of connecting
to the system.

|